As Vikings and Norse Pagans we need to know who are enemy is, and also not get them confused with other peoples we are not at war with. Our enemy is Christo-Fascists. We have no reason to be at war with true Christains that actually follow the teachings of their God. Both may in some ways look similar, but they are not at all the same, and we must know the difference. Thus here is the needed knowledge to know the difference. True Christains that come to us in frith deserve our hospitality, but Christo-Fascists deserve nothing other than our sword piercing through their body, but for now let’s try to defeat them at the voting booth. Vote all blue in 2024, no matter how dead the blue canident is. A mostly dead blue team leader is far better than any Christo-Fascist/MAGA/Agenda2024/Trump leader at all.

We must make a distinction. As a free society we should be accepting of all positive lifestyles and viewpoints, but not allow anyone to promote an agenda based on trying to control and limit anyone’s (peaceful) freedom. We must become aware of and know the difference between MEGA/Agenda 2025 promoters and normal Christains that actually follow the teachings of Jesus (or anyone that actually follows the positive teachings of any religion). The founding fathers of the USA founded this country with separation of church and state, to allow everyone the freedom to follow whatever religion they choose, or none at all, and so no one has to be under the thumb of a state based religion. Let us make a distinction then:

### Understanding the Difference: True Christians vs. Christo-Fascists

The term “Christian” encompasses a diverse spectrum of beliefs and practices, often leading to significant differences in interpretation and application of teachings attributed to Jesus Christ. At one end of this spectrum are those who earnestly strive to embody the teachings of Jesus in their daily lives, while at the other end are individuals and groups whose interpretations and actions are characterized by authoritarianism, exclusionary practices, and sometimes, extremism. This article aims to explore and differentiate between these two groups: true Christians and Christo-Fascists, while also examining biblical warnings against false teachings.

#### True Christians: Following the Teachings of Jesus

True Christians, in the purest sense, are those who seek to emulate the life and teachings of Jesus Christ. This includes principles of love, compassion, forgiveness, and humility as outlined in the New Testament. Key characteristics of true Christians include:

1. **Love and Compassion**: They prioritize loving their neighbors as themselves, regardless of differences in beliefs, backgrounds, or lifestyles. They strive to show compassion and empathy towards others, following the example of Jesus who welcomed all.

2. **Humility and Service**: True Christians emphasize humility and service to others. They believe in putting others’ needs before their own, reflecting Jesus’ teachings on servant leadership.

3. **Non-violence and Peacemaking**: They advocate for peaceful resolutions to conflicts and reject violence as a means of advancing their beliefs. This aligns with Jesus’ teachings on turning the other cheek and seeking reconciliation.

4. **Inclusivity and Acceptance**: They embrace diversity and welcome individuals from all walks of life, echoing Jesus’ ministry which reached out to marginalized groups and sinners.

5. **Social Justice**: True Christians often engage in efforts to promote social justice and alleviate suffering, inspired by Jesus’ advocacy for the poor, oppressed, and marginalized.

#### Christo-Fascists: Characteristics and Practices

On the other hand, Christo-Fascists represent a distortion of Christian principles into a form of authoritarianism and exclusivism. Characteristics of Christo-Fascists may include:

1. **Authoritarianism**: They advocate for strict adherence to their interpretation of Christianity, often imposing their beliefs on others and suppressing dissent within their communities.

2. **Exclusivism and Intolerance**: Christo-Fascists may exhibit intolerance towards those who do not share their specific theological or political views. They may view themselves as the sole arbiters of truth and salvation, excluding others who do not conform.

3. **Nationalism and Xenophobia**: Some Christo-Fascist groups intertwine nationalism with their religious beliefs, promoting an “us versus them” mentality that can lead to xenophobia and prejudice against minorities or outsiders.

4. **Militancy and Aggression**: In extreme cases, Christo-Fascists may advocate or engage in militant actions, justifying violence or coercion in the name of defending their faith or enforcing their moral code.

5. **Lack of Compassion and Mercy**: Unlike true Christians who emphasize forgiveness and reconciliation, Christo-Fascists may prioritize judgment and punishment, often harshly condemning those they perceive as sinners or moral deviants.

#### Biblical Warnings Against False Teachings

The Bible itself contains warnings against false teachings and distortions of the Gospel. One notable passage is from the New Testament, where the apostle Paul writes in 2 Corinthians 11:13-15 (NIV):

*”For such people are false apostles, deceitful workers, masquerading as apostles of Christ. And no wonder, for Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light. It is not surprising, then, if his servants also masquerade as servants of righteousness. Their end will be what their actions deserve.”*

This passage underscores the dangers of deceptive teachings that claim to be Christian but distort the true message of Christ. It serves as a cautionary reminder to discern between genuine adherence to Christ’s teachings and those ideologies that manipulate faith for personal or ideological gain.

### Conclusion

In summary, while both true Christians and Christo-Fascists identify with the Christian faith, their interpretations and practices diverge significantly. True Christians adhere to the teachings of Jesus Christ with a focus on love, compassion, humility, and inclusivity. In contrast, Christo-Fascists distort these teachings through authoritarianism, exclusivism, and, in extreme cases, militant actions. Understanding these distinctions, alongside biblical warnings against false teachings, is crucial in discussions about faith, ethics, and the impact of religious beliefs on society.

True Christains are our brothers and sisters, no matter what faith we ourselves may follow (if any at all). Christo-Fascists are our enemies and a dire threat to humanity, and as such we who seek to live in a free society and desire peace in the world must stand up to and fight against Christo-Fascists. In 2024 the first line of defense against the Christo-Fascist agenda, as spearheaded by MAGA and Agenda 2025, is to vote blue all across the board. If we lose this election, sadly the next and only step will be a 2nd US Civil War, so the stakes are higher than ever before, vote all blue.

This is more knowledge, we Vikings and Norse-Pagans need to have to help defeat our enemies, Christo-Fascists. It was Christo-Fascists in the past that killed our Viking religion and culture, but we have been reborn in the modern times, and we can nver allow our faith or culture to be destroyed again. As Vikings we must fight to protect our way of life, and so in term also protect everyone else’s right to follow whatever religion or culture they choose to.

Deism emerged as a philosophical and theological movement during the Enlightenment in Europe and America during the 17th and 18th centuries. It represented a departure from traditional religious doctrines and emphasized reason, natural law, and the existence of a creator deity who established the universe but does not intervene in its affairs after creation. Here’s a detailed exploration of Deism, including its history, philosophy, influence, and decline:

History of Deism

Deism arose in response to the religious and political turmoil of the time, influenced by scientific discoveries and critical thinking. Its roots can be traced to Renaissance humanism, which prioritized human reason and secular learning. The term “Deism” itself derives from the Latin word “deus,” meaning god, and refers to belief in a transcendent creator who designed the universe but does not interact with it through miracles or revelations.

The early proponents of Deism include figures like Lord Herbert of Cherbury and John Toland in England, who advocated for a natural religion based on reason and morality rather than dogma. In continental Europe, philosophers such as René Descartes and Baruch Spinoza laid the groundwork with their rationalist approaches to theology and metaphysics, which influenced later Deistic thought.

Ideas and Philosophy of Deism

1. Existence of God: Deism affirms the existence of a supreme being or creator who designed the universe and established natural laws. This deity is often characterized as a distant observer, not involved in human affairs or divine intervention.
2. Role of Reason: Deists prioritize reason and empirical observation over religious authority or scripture. They view the universe as orderly and governed by natural laws comprehensible through human intellect.
3. Natural Religion: Deism promotes a “natural religion” based on ethical principles derived from reason and the study of nature. Morality is seen as inherent in human nature and accessible through rational reflection.
4. Critique of Revelation: Deists reject the authority of religious revelations, miracles, and sacred scriptures as sources of divine knowledge. They emphasize the sufficiency of reason in understanding morality and the natural world.
5. Freedom of Thought: Deism advocates for intellectual freedom and skepticism towards religious orthodoxy. It supports individual autonomy in matters of belief and encourages critical inquiry.

Influence of Deism

Deism had a profound impact on Enlightenment thought, political philosophy, and religious discourse:

1. Political Philosophy: Deistic ideas contributed to the development of secularism and separation of church and state. Influential figures like Thomas Jefferson and Thomas Paine, who were Deists, advocated for religious tolerance and the primacy of reason in governance.
2. Science and Rationalism: Deism fostered an environment conducive to scientific inquiry by promoting a worldview compatible with natural laws and empirical investigation. Many Enlightenment scientists, such as Isaac Newton and Benjamin Franklin, were influenced by Deistic principles.
3. Religious Reform: Deism challenged orthodox religious doctrines and contributed to religious reform movements by encouraging a more rational and inclusive approach to spirituality.

Decline of Deism

By the late 18th century, Deism began to decline due to several factors:

1. Criticism and Opposition: Deism faced criticism from religious authorities and orthodox believers who viewed its rejection of revelation and miracles as undermining traditional faith.
2. Shift in Philosophical Trends: The rise of Romanticism and Idealism in the 19th century emphasized intuition, emotion, and spiritual experiences, diverging from Deistic emphasis on reason and naturalism.
3. Fragmentation: Deism lacked institutional cohesion and a unified theological framework, making it susceptible to fragmentation and absorption into broader philosophical movements.
4. Secularization: As secularism gained traction, the appeal of Deism as a middle ground between religious faith and scientific rationalism diminished.

Conclusion

Deism was a significant intellectual movement that challenged conventional religious beliefs, promoted reason and natural law, and influenced Enlightenment thought and political philosophy. While its influence waned over time, Deism left a lasting legacy in the development of religious tolerance, secular governance, and the promotion of scientific inquiry based on natural laws and empirical evidence. Today, its principles continue to resonate in debates over the relationship between faith, reason, and ethics in modern society.

This article is not Norse-Pagan, but all Americans, including Norse-Pagans need to understand the correct historical founding motives of the founding fathers and early American colonists to fight back against MEGA and Project 2025 rhetoric. As Norse-Pagans we need to invoke the knowledge based approach of Odin, to defeat our enemies.

Overview

The current political situation in the USA, particularly the move towards Christo-fascism and the erosion of checks and balances, starkly contrasts with the principles and intentions that founded the nation. The American Revolution, inspired by Enlightenment philosophy, sought to establish a government rooted in democracy, individual rights, and the separation of church and state. This stands in opposition to the current trajectory towards a government that integrates religious doctrine with state policy and undermines democratic norms.

Enlightenment Philosophy and the American Founding

The Enlightenment philosophy of the late 18th century emphasized reason, individual liberty, and the separation of church and state. Thinkers like John Locke, Montesquieu, and Voltaire influenced the Founding Fathers, who envisioned a republic free from the tyrannies of both monarchy and state-sponsored religion.

1. Reason and Science: Enlightenment thought prioritized rationalism and scientific inquiry over religious dogma. This is reflected in the secular foundations of the American Constitution, which does not reference Christianity or any deity.
2. Separation of Powers: Inspired by Montesquieu, the Founders established a system of checks and balances to prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful. Current trends toward weakening judicial independence and executive overreach threaten this balance.
3. Individual Rights: The Bill of Rights enshrines individual liberties such as freedom of speech, religion, and assembly. Efforts to impose a single religious worldview through government policy directly undermine these freedoms.

The Intentions of the Founding Fathers

The Founding Fathers were clear in their intention to separate church and state. Thomas Jefferson’s Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom and James Madison’s Memorial and Remonstrance Against Religious Assessments exemplify their commitment to religious liberty and the prevention of state-sponsored religion.

1. Thomas Jefferson: Advocated for a “wall of separation between church and state” to ensure religious freedom and prevent religious tyranny.
2. James Madison: Opposed religious establishments as detrimental to both government and religion.

References to God in Founding Documents

When references to God do appear in founding documents, such as the Declaration of Independence, they typically invoke a Deistic concept of a Creator or Providence, reflecting Enlightenment influences rather than specific Christian doctrine. The term “Nature’s God” in the Declaration of Independence aligns with Deist beliefs in a rational, naturalistic view of divinity. Notably, Jesus is never mentioned in any of the founding documents, emphasizing the intention to create a secular government.

Early Colonial Groups and Their Agendas

The early colonists who settled in what would become the 13 colonies had diverse religious and social agendas, many of which were motivated by a desire to escape religious persecution in Europe and to establish communities where they could freely practice their beliefs without state interference.

1. New England Colonists:

• Puritans: Sought to build a “city upon a hill” based on their religious principles, but over time, their theocratic tendencies were moderated by the broader colonial experience and Enlightenment ideas.
• Pilgrims: Separatists who left England to practice their faith freely, contributing to the culture of religious tolerance in New England.

1. Pennsylvania Colonists:

• Quakers: Founded Pennsylvania under William Penn as a “Holy Experiment” based on religious tolerance and pacifism.
• Powwow Practitioners and Amish: Represented other minority religious groups seeking to live according to their beliefs without interference, contributing to Pennsylvania’s pluralistic society.

1. Southern Colonists:

• Catholics: Maryland was initially founded as a haven for Catholics facing persecution in Protestant England.
• Anglicans and Other Protestants: Dominated the southern colonies, but the region also saw the establishment of diverse religious communities seeking freedom from Europe’s religious conflicts.

Escaping European Religious Wars

Many colonists left Europe to escape the constant wars between different Christian denominations that plagued the continent. They sought to create a society where religious differences would not lead to conflict and where they could live according to their convictions without fear of persecution.

1. New England: The Pilgrims and Puritans fled from the Church of England’s intolerance and the religious conflicts in Europe.
2. Pennsylvania: Quakers and other religious minorities left Europe to escape persecution and to establish a community based on religious freedom and tolerance.
3. Maryland and Southern Colonies: Catholics and various Protestant groups sought refuge from the religious wars and intolerance of Europe.

Current Political Situation vs. Founding Principles

1. Integration of Religion and State: The current push towards a government influenced by Christian nationalism directly opposes the secular intentions of the Founding Fathers and the Enlightenment principles they followed.
2. Erosion of Checks and Balances: Actions that undermine the independence of the judiciary and concentrate power in the executive branch threaten the system of checks and balances essential to American democracy.
3. Threat to Individual Liberties: Policies that impose a particular religious doctrine infringe upon the freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution, echoing the very religious persecution early colonists sought to escape.

Conclusion

The current political trajectory in the USA, characterized by the erosion of checks and balances and the integration of religious doctrine into government policy, is antithetical to the principles that founded the nation. It undermines the Enlightenment ideals of reason, individual liberty, and the separation of church and state. It disregards the intentions of the Founding Fathers and the diverse motivations of early colonists who sought to escape religious persecution and establish a society based on freedom and tolerance. To honor the legacy of the American Revolution and the foundations of the United States, it is crucial to resist these trends and reaffirm the commitment to democratic principles and religious liberty.

The United States has recently witnessed a seismic shift in its political landscape. Over the past nine days, the MAGA (Make America Great Again) movement has effectively seized control of the Republican Party, propelling forward its vision for America under Project 2025. This project aims to transform the nation into a Christo-Fascist state, eradicating the secular and pluralistic values that have long defined American democracy. For Norse-Pagans, Vikings, and all who cherish religious freedom and cultural diversity, the stakes could not be higher. The time to act is now: voting blue is not just a political choice but a necessity for survival.

The Rise of MAGA and Project 2025

MAGA’s ascendancy has dismantled the traditional checks and balances that once curbed extremist agendas. The Supreme Court’s recent decisions have paved the way for the implementation of Project 2025, removing the legal and institutional barriers that protected the separation of church and state. This project envisions an America where Christian nationalism reigns supreme, marginalizing all other belief systems, including Norse-Paganism.

The Threat to Religious Freedom

Norse-Pagans and Vikings, with their rich tapestry of gods, traditions, and rituals, represent a vibrant and diverse religious community. However, under a Christo-Fascist regime, their beliefs would be persecuted. The imposition of a singular religious ideology threatens to criminalize non-Christian practices, erode the right to religious expression, and dismantle the freedoms that allow Norse-Pagans to worship openly. This is not a speculative fear; history is replete with examples of religious minorities being oppressed under authoritarian regimes.

Cultural Erasure and Historical Revisionism

Beyond religious persecution, Norse-Pagans and Vikings face the danger of cultural erasure. Project 2025 aims to rewrite history to fit a narrow, Christian nationalist narrative. The rich mythologies, sagas, and cultural contributions of Norse heritage would be overshadowed by a monolithic historical account that excludes diverse perspectives. Such revisionism not only diminishes the contributions of Norse culture but also impoverishes the American cultural mosaic as a whole.

The Importance of a Democratic Landslide

To halt the march of MAGA and Project 2025, a landslide victory for the Democratic Party is essential. Only a decisive blue wave can restore the checks and balances necessary to protect religious and cultural freedoms. Voting blue means endorsing a platform that values diversity, upholds the separation of church and state, and champions the rights of all religious and cultural communities.

The Consequences of Failure

Should Trump win the election and Project 2025 proceed unchecked, the consequences would be dire. The transformation of the United States into a Christo-Fascist state would likely precipitate civil unrest and potentially a second Civil War. For Norse-Pagans and Vikings, this scenario is not merely a political defeat but an existential threat. The community would face increased violence, legal discrimination, and the systematic dismantling of their cultural and religious institutions.

Conclusion: A Call to Action

In light of these dangers, it is imperative for Norse-Pagans and Vikings to mobilize politically and vote blue. The upcoming election is not just a battle for political power but a fight for the soul of the nation. By voting blue, Norse-Pagans and Vikings can help ensure that America remains a land of religious freedom and cultural diversity, rather than succumbing to the oppressive vision of Project 2025. The choice is stark: vote blue or face the peril of living under a regime that threatens their very existence. Now is the time to stand up, be counted, and protect the values that make America truly great.